Pexels/Reddit
Traveling together can become surprisingly complicated when couples have different spending priorities.
The following story is about a man who bought two direct economy tickets to London but refused to pay an additional $700 for reserved seats.
He believed they would probably end up sitting together anyway and preferred saving money for activities during the trip.
His partner disagreed with this and demanded that he pay an additional $700 so they could sit together for sure.
Hmmm… sounds like a tough decision to make, huh? Let’s take a closer look!
AITA I don’t want to pay for intercontinental flight seats
I purchased 2 tickets for me and my significant other.
They cost $2,000 for economy, which isn’t too bad for direct flights from the US to London.
I did not choose seats and pay those fees, as they cost $700 to $950 additional.
My significant other asks me to add the seats on for $700 more.
This man refused to pay for selected seats but offered to compromise.
I say no, thank you. I offer a compromise.
You can pay for that portion of the trip and pay for the seats.
She did not like my attitude about it. AITA?
The trip is my idea.
He thinks saving on seats can give them more money to enjoy their vacation.
In about 80% of the cases, we end up sitting next to each other anyway by picking fee-free seats on the day of travel.
A plane is a bus with wings for me.
The cheaper we travel, the more things we can afford to do.
I think the disagreement is less about the seats and more about how each person views travel spending.
If sitting together matters that much to OP’s partner, asking her to cover the upgrade herself seems reasonable.
But they probably should have discussed the budget beforehand to have avoided such an argument.
Let’s check out the comments of other people on this story.
This user shares their personal thoughts.
She can pay the difference, says this one.
This person chimes in.
If you enjoyed this story, check out this post about a man whose mom thinks he should give the home he saved for to his “more deserving” sister.
This one understands both sides.
Finally, short and true.
Would you rather pay $700 or risk not sitting together with your partner?