Pexels/Reddit

“Getting your foot in the door” sounds considerably less promising when the door eventually closes, and you’re asked to train whoever gets to stay on the other side.

One nonprofit worker took a temporary, part-time fundraising position after an acquaintance at the organization urgently recruited her. There had recently been a wave of resignations—which, in retrospect, may have deserved a little more attention—but there was also a potentially exciting opportunity attached. Her new boss encouraged her to apply for the permanent role, and the employee already had a long-standing interest in working for the organization.

More importantly, the timing felt unusually significant. She was going through a divorce, raising a young child, and hoping for a little professional stability while the rest of her life was anything but stable. Her boss knew all of that and specifically used it as part of the pitch for why she should pursue the job long-term.

So she applied, interviewed twice, and kept doing the work.

Then her direct supervisor seemingly stopped communicating with her—while sitting three feet away.

It wasn’t until she noticed everyone else participating in later-round interviews that she realized she’d apparently been eliminated from consideration.

Unfortunately, the awkward part was only beginning.

Practical advice for surviving a month of training my replacement after being denied the job?

I was contacted by a distant acquaintance to urgently take a part-time temporary position under her in the fundraising department of a large-ish nonprofit ($20 million in annual revenue).

I agreed, especially because she said she would consider me for the long-term role. (Four people had quit abruptly and she needed to staff up. 🚩)

She (Big boss) had just made an offer to a guy who would be my direct boss, and this position would be under him. I had wanted to work at this org for years—I even made it to the final round for a VP position in 2023–so I was excited to get my toe in the door (even though it was several rungs down on the ladder).

Exciting times!

Big boss emphasized to me that I should really consider formally applying for the long-term position because I am getting divorced and I have a young child at home, and she knows how hard it is to be in that situation.

I was convinced by her saying that—I just need things to be easy in my life right now, with so much else being painfully hard.

Fast forward three months, two interviews later and I realize that my direct boss has basically ghosted me while his desk is three feet away from mine.

No way.

He is conducting third-round interviews with other candidates and hasn’t informed me that I didn’t make it past the second round. My other colleagues in the department are involved in the hiring process for this person, too, so they all know.

I message the big boss (the one that originally hired me and insisted I apply for the long-term job) and tell her I found out in a roundabout manner, and I’d like to set an end date for my time at the org. (She correctly infers that I’m angry.)

We eventually talk and she apologizes for how badly it went down. She asks if I will document my processes—processes that I had to learn or develop from scratch because the existing materials were useless. I say that, in the three days/week I am scheduled to work, that I can’t possibly do my current tasks and also write a manual on them. She says, she will have the new hire shadow me and take their own notes.

Alrighty…

The new person started yesterday and I’m in a personal hell. I thought, “I have 15 years in this field (though not this skill area of the industry)—but maybe they chose someone who is an expert in this software.” No. They didn’t.

She had no experience in it and less work experience overall and no experience in this field. And they revamped the job description and reassigned the duties from what had previously been under my title to be under a lower title person (not yet hired), so I have to wait even longer to be laid off.

Today they finally made an offer to the next new person who will take over my duties (in theory). They want me to stay on for four more weeks at the very least. If I quit voluntarily, I don’t get unemployment.

Can we say “unfair”?

The thing they are very short-sighted about: I am currently the ONLY person in this nonprofit who knows how to do the data entry and communication to the finance department about the $10 million in donations that comes through our department. (Remember, there was massive turnover before I started—no one has any institutional knowledge.)

It took me fully one month to figure out how to do ONE entry to satisfy finance (and now I am completely up to speed on the entries)

. If I quit abruptly, it will take them at least six weeks to have that new person start and then figure out from there, with no one to train them.

Woof.

I don’t want to burn bridges with the big boss, exactly, but we weren’t close before and I don’t think that I will ever voluntarily talk to her again.

How can I get through this???

Apologies for length. I’m so frazzled.

Commenters sympathized with the employee’s anger, but much of the practical advice came down to one thing: stop giving this organization more than the job currently requires.

She doesn’t need to sabotage anyone, withhold information, or storm out dramatically. In fact, if preserving unemployment eligibility matters, making an impulsive exit could hurt her considerably more than it hurts the nonprofit. But that doesn’t mean she needs to spend her remaining weeks heroically rescuing an organization that handled her candidacy so poorly.

The cleanest approach is probably to work her scheduled hours, perform the duties she’s being paid to perform, and provide reasonable training during that time. If management wants extensive documentation, additional training sessions, or a flawless transfer of institutional knowledge, they can decide which existing responsibilities should be deprioritized to make room for it. There are only so many hours in three workdays.

And she should absolutely resist the temptation to make the transition easier by donating unpaid time or somehow compressing months of hard-earned knowledge into an emergency crash course. She spent weeks figuring out processes because the organization had inadequate documentation after significant turnover. That institutional failure isn’t hers to magically fix on the way out.

There’s also a larger lesson in the fact that she is apparently the only person who currently understands a process connected to millions of dollars in donations. If one temporary, part-time employee leaving creates that much operational risk, the problem isn’t the employee leaving. It’s an organization that allowed critical knowledge to sit with one person while simultaneously planning to replace that person.

She can be professional without being endlessly accommodating. Train the replacements during paid hours, document what reasonably fits into the schedule, keep records of relevant conversations, and let management own the consequences of its decisions.

They chose not to give her the permanent job. They also don’t get to expect permanent-job levels of investment while she patiently engineers the perfect transition for everyone who gets to remain.

This person has an idea on what to do next.

This person agrees.

And this person says it like it is…

If she’s apparently not qualified enough to keep the job, she shouldn’t have to perform miracles teaching everyone else how to do it.