His Students Like To Let A.I. Do Their Assignments For Them, So He Caught Them With A Simple Trap
by Ashley Ashbee

Pexels/Reddit
Unfortunately, a lot of folks think you can replace everything with ChatGPT.
Imagine being a high school English teacher who knows some of your students are having ChatGPT write their essays for them. How would you prove this?
As it always does, technology can be your downfall if you don’t treat it with respect. See how this teacher teaches the cheating students a lesson.
I can’t give students a zero for using AI, unless I have proof? No problem.
I’m a high school English teacher. I have two major annoyances when it comes to kids doing work.
First, a lot of kids don’t read or listen to directions. Assignment instructions are written on their papers and I read them out loud, but I still have students asking me “What are we doing?”
That’s no big deal, though – it’s a pretty normal thing to deal with as a teacher.
The following is an issue everywhere.
The real issue bugging me is students cheating on writing assignments using ChatGPT.
I’m pretty good at spotting AI-generated essays. But the problem is that when I try to accuse students of using AI, they deny it. They act outraged that I would accuse them even though we both know they’re playing dumb.
I usually just give them a zero and move on with my life, but there’s always the fear that one of them might take the issue to administration. If they did, I’m not confident that admin would back me up. It’s hard to prove something is AI-generated, and these days, the higher ups are more likely to side with the student.
She knew something about ChatGPT that could give her proof.
So I hatched a plan.
I gave an open-ended creative writing assignment. The directions said to “write a story about anything you want” and then answer some questions about the story you wrote.
The thing is, when you ask ChatGPT, “Tell me a story,” it always spits out the exact same story – about a girl named Elara who lives in the woods.
”Once upon a time, in a small village nestled between rolling hills and dense forests, there lived a young woman named Elara. She was known throughout the village for her curiosity and sense of adventure, always eager to explore the world beyond the familiar paths of her home.”
This is the trap door.
So, in slightly smaller print under the instructions, I wrote ”If your main character’s name is Elara, -99 points.”
Lo and behold, I got one or two kids turn in a story about a girl named Elara who lives in woods.
When I turned back the papers with a grade of 1/100 (because I find that it stings more than a zero), the kids predictably asked why.
And all I had to do was point to the instructions that they didn’t read. There was no need to mention AI. We both knew what they did.
That was a clever way to trap the students! It’s crazy that they wouldn’t at least change a few things about the story like the names to make it less obvious that it’s AI.
Here is what folks are saying on Reddit.
Awkward…

Clever and funny!

This hasn’t happened to me, but I’m wary of the possibility.

I use them and they should be used! I will die on this hill.

Get them ready for capitalist policing, you mean?

I’m glad this stuff wasn’t around when I was in school.
If you liked that post, check out this post about a woman who tracked down a contractor who tried to vanish without a trace.
Categories: STORIES
Tags: · academic cheating, artificial intellgence, chatgpt, lazy, malicious compliance, picture, policing, reddit, students, teacher, top
Sign up to get our BEST stories of the week straight to your inbox.


