When it comes to space exploration, there are a lot of factors that go into what can be accomplished. As with almost everything in life, one of the main factors is always going to be budget.

Unfortunately (from NASA’s perspective) the latest federal budget proposals are cutting heavily from the space agency, which means that certain projects need to be canceled or put on hold.

NASA’s interim leader, Sean Duffy, has been trying to put a positive spin on the situation, but it is hard to make a case for less money being a good thing. As has recently been reported by Ars Technica, Duffy said the following about how his agency will handle the situation:

“What we’re going to do is look at our budget, so we look at our timing, and you know, how do we spend money better? And you know, what technology do we have to get samples back more quickly? And so that’s a current analysis that’s happening right now.”

One specific area that is likely to be cut is the mission that was being planed to pick up some Martian rocks and bring them back to Earth. For many space enthusiasts, this is a major blow to advancement, especially since the Mars rover has found at least some evidence of life on the red planet (whether it is currently active or it once was a long time ago).

The rover, however, has limited analysis tools, which makes it hard to learn more than we already know. Bringing samples back to Earth, on the other hand, would open a world of possibilities.

University of Colorado Boulder senior research scientist, Bruce Jakosky, recently talked to Space.com about the situation, saying:

“Our understanding of Mars has gotten to the point that the questions we’re asking can best be addressed with returned samples. To decide not to return them, or to put it off to an indefinite future time with human missions would be to take a major step back in exploring the solar system and the universe and in continuing to develop our scientific understanding of the world around us.”

The Trump administration seems set on focusing on missions that could potentially take people to Mars (and, hopefully, bring them home) rather than just bringing samples home. While boots on the ground on Mars would be an incredible accomplishment, it is a much more complicated and dangerous mission compared to just planning a mission to bring samples back to Earth.

Some experts also argue that conducting a mission that makes the round trip to Mars and back home unmanned, should be a first step toward bringing people to the Red Planet. An unmanned mission would provide a lot of information and help to highlight potential dangers that we don’t already know about.

On top of that, China is already planning to send a craft to Mars to collect samples and return as soon as 2028. Allowing China to win this new space race is certainly not something NASA wants to do.

For now, however, it remains to be seen exactly what the budget for 2026 and beyond will look like, and where that money is spent.

Thought that was fascinating? Here’s another story you might like: Why You’ll Never See A Great White Shark In An Aquarium