More and more apartment complexes and other rented properties are installing charging stations for electric vehicles.

After all, we want to encourage people moving toward a sustainable future, right?

But when one Tesla owner tried to strongarm the HOA board, he ended up with the opposite of progress.

Check it out.

You need to follow the law! OK, no problem

I live in an apartment block in Europe with about 100 apartments in total.

Every year we have an election for what could be compared to an american HOA, where we elect a president and a couple of board members to manage the general expenses and daily maintenance tasks (fixing garage port, cleaning common areas, security cameras…).

While we do have a rulebook of sorts, nobody in the board has ever been too bothered by neighbors going their own way as long as there is no complaints.

I mean, he knew there weren’t chargers when he bought the car.

I am the president of this HOA as of today, and I have had my fair share of interesting neighbors… but this one takes the cake.

He bought a fancy Tesla, which he made an effort to flash around the neighbors (kind of condescending on how useless “old cars” are, how we live in the past…).

Thing is, we don’t have a charging station in the garage, so he has to go to the gas station to fill up the battery.

There was no charger when he came in, so that shouldn’t come as a surprise here.

They invited him to join the board, but when he declined, they moved on to other priorities.

But as soon as he got the car, he started pestering the board asking about the EV-charger (we need to keep up with the modern times, you know?).

We repeatedly answered that it is in our plans, and that we would love to get him on board to help us, as he was the main interested person for the task.

This should make the process much more efficient.

He never responded to the invitation to join and help (there is even a small payment for the board members!), and we are slammed with other higher priority tasks that have suddenly popped up (fire alarm upgrades, changing parts of the sprinklers…).

So we really cannot use much time in EV charging, although we all agree that we have to get that going.

So, the guy just decided to strong-arm them.

Suddenly, I got a phone call from an electrician reading from the law that we cannot deny a EV-charger in the garage, and that he would come the following week at our earliest convenience.

I just asked him for some time to read the law and make sure we were on the same page, and in the conversation he slipped the name of the person who had ordered the charger.

To no surprise, it was the Tesla man!

(There are others with EVs in the garage, and we have a fluent communication with them about this matter. They prefer to wait than to work on the case, which is fine by me).

It didn’t exactly work.

So, I re-read all the laws and our internal regulations to make sure that we were following everything to the letter.

It turns out that the law forces a HOA to facilitate the infrastructure for EV charging (not the stations themselves) as long as there is not a force majeure reason against it (like economical reasons).

And our internal regulations state that changing essential infrastructure of the building needs to be done under the approval of the general assembly, which happens once a year.

I talked to our finance manager, and he argued strongly against such an expense without getting a loan to partially finance it, as it would destabilize the economy of the community.

Now, he’s going to have to wait a lot longer.

With all that, we decided to comply with the regulations fully:

1- We won’t decide on any structural changes on the building until the next general assembly

2- We need a person dedicated to following the steps of finding providers, comparing offers, and presenting them first to the board and then to the rest of the neighbors. This also includes safety measurements for the upgraded infrastructure.

3- Once we have a budget, we will find bank offers for the loan that we will have to take most likely

4- We need to hire a lawyer to update the rulebook to account for the use of chargers in the garage

As steps 1 and 3 are dependent on general assemblies, the process will inevitably be prolonged in time, and we know that neighbors are generally against taking up a loan that will increase their monthly costs.

So he will have to fight an uphill battle for being a pain in the butt.

The best part of this is that before all this happened, we were considering setting a temporary charging station for everyone (instead of the “ideal” solution of everyone being free to set their charger on their spot), that would not require a loan, and was planned to be done during 2022.

Now, we will have to ask the assembly if this is an interesting way forward, and abide by the response.

I feel bad for the EV owners, because when the Tesla guy invoked the rules the game changed and now they have to wait for all the official process instead of having a temporary, just a-ok solution while we got the rest in place

I bet he wishes he had been part of the solution.

Let’s find out Reddit’s reaction to all of this.

That’s the worst kind of mad.

This person thinks he’s making too big of a deal.

Another tip for resolving things.

Nothing to be done about the waiting.

They may need extra insurance, too.

Be part of the solution!

Maybe that way something you want will actually get done.

If you liked that post, check out this one about an employee that got revenge on HR when they refused to reimburse his travel.