Getting promoted usually means you’re doing something right. And after taking on more responsibility, asking for a raise doesn’t exactly seem like an outrageous next step.

One longtime employee thought they were on solid ground with their company after several years of positive performance reviews, successful initiatives and increasingly significant responsibilities. They’d even received a promotion the previous year, although they’d agreed to take on the new role without an immediate pay increase.

At the beginning of this year, they decided it was finally time to discuss compensation.

The company ultimately declined, citing the employee’s already generous salary. Disappointing? Sure. But the employee understood the reasoning and didn’t consider the rejection particularly surprising.

What happened afterward, however, was considerably harder to explain.

Management suddenly began questioning why the employee was unhappy, despite their insistence that wanting a raise wasn’t the same thing as disliking their job.

Then came a meeting filled with unexpected negative feedback, an offer to return to their previous position and a rather confusing reversal.

Now, instead of discussing a raise, they’re writing their own performance improvement plan.

Years of positive reviews, asked for a raise, and suddenly I’m on a PIP.

I’ve worked for the same company for several years and always had positive yearly reviews and conversations with my manager. I regularly took on more responsibility and started new initiatives.

Last year I asked for and received a promotion, but without a raise. I accepted it because I wanted to prove myself in the new role first.

At the beginning of this year, I asked for a raise to go with the increased responsibilities.

Good for you.

After several months, they refused, mainly because I’m already one of the highest earners in the company. That’s probably true, I’m paid well and above market rate so while I was disappointed and told them so, the refusal itself wasn’t a huge surprise.

My raise request led to several conversations about why I was “unhappy.” I was even told that if I were happy with my job, I wouldn’t need a raise to feel validated.

Then this summer, I went into what I thought was a normal meeting with my bosses and got 45 minutes of entirely negative feedback.

Excuse me?

Apparently multiple team members had anonymously complained about me, and management now considered my performance in my new position very poor. This was completely different from the feedback I’d received before.

They asked if I wanted to step back into my old role, but warned that if I did, they couldn’t guarantee I’d still have a job because they’d need to hire someone for my current position.

My boss also explicitly told me he didn’t believe I could improve enough to succeed in the role.

Wow.

After thinking about it for a few weeks, I agreed to step back.

They seemed genuinely surprised with my choice, which is weird when they put so much pressure on me. Then they told me stepping back actually wasn’t possible and instead put me on a two-month PIP, which I had to write myself.

So now I’m confused about what they actually want.

This just keeps getting worse, and weirder.

If they don’t believe I can improve, why give me a PIP? If stepping back wasn’t possible, why offer it? And if they simply want me gone, why not fire me?

I’m not in the US, and a PIP doesn’t give them any special legal protection here so they’d still owe me the normal compensation if they fire me.

I’ve also talked to my teammates, and everyone I’ve spoken to has been positive toward me, although obviously I can’t know what people said anonymously.

Truth.

Does this sound like they’re trying to manage me out?

Or just management handling a genuine performance problem incredibly badly?

Either way, would you start looking for another job?

Never Miss a Story

Sign up to get our BEST stories of the week straight to your inbox.

The timing of these events understandably raises questions, but it doesn’t necessarily prove the company is deliberately trying to push this employee out.

It’s possible that management had legitimate concerns about their performance in the new position. Positive reviews in a previous role don’t automatically guarantee success after a promotion, and anonymous feedback from coworkers shouldn’t be dismissed simply because the employee’s direct conversations with teammates have been positive.

But if those concerns were serious enough to warrant a performance improvement plan, why weren’t they communicated earlier? And why offer a return to the previous position, complete with a warning about potential job loss, only to withdraw that option when the employee accepted?

The most troubling detail may be the manager’s admission that he doesn’t believe the employee can improve enough to succeed. A PIP should establish clear expectations and provide a genuine opportunity to meet them. Asking someone to write their own plan after expressing such little confidence in their abilities sends a decidedly mixed message.

Regardless of management’s intentions, quietly exploring other opportunities would give the employee more control over an increasingly uncertain situation. They can also document the feedback they’ve received, request measurable expectations and continue fulfilling their responsibilities while deciding what comes next.

Because whether this is an attempt to manage someone out or simply badly handled performance management, neither explanation inspires much confidence in the employee’s future there.

This person says to start putting their resume out there.

This person says to ask for a raise instead of a title change.

And this person says to leave. Now. Not worth. it.

They asked for a raise, but apparently the only thing management was willing to increase was their list of shortcomings.